Psycho Cultural Conflict Theory

Psycho Cultural fighting Theory check to the psycho-cultural infringe hypothesis, individuation is the most important need in the hierarchy of human necessitate and, when denied, results in knock-down-and-drag-out involution. The satisfaction of atomic number 53s basic needs is intricately related to his/her identity. The Psycho-cultural Conflict Theory is similar to the Primordial coming to ethnicity which emphasizes the fact that the great unwasheds ethnicity (identity) is deeply rooted in their past.Irobi (2005) argues that memories of past traumas magnify peoples anxieties. This is as a result of ethnic identity which produces fear, hatred and, consequently, ethnic strife among two ethnic stems which kick in a history of ethnic dissimilitude and stratification. Irobi posits that when an ethnic group has a history of being stereotyped and discriminated ground on their ethnic identity from a nonher group, it results in violent engagement since ethnic identity re mas ter(prenominal)s part and parcel of the entirety of an individual. pagan groups which have been discriminated against and stratified into petty(a)er class citizens always habour a ghost of marginalization of their identity and this produces strong feelings of hatred and resentment towards the other group which did the discrimination. This is what Richardson Jr. Sen (1996) call victim mentality. Irobi (2005) criticizes the inadequacy of modernization theory which holds that contemporaneousness will result in the dissolution of ethnic affiliation. He observes that ethnicity is unflinching and part of the identity of individuals and groups. Therefore, any marginalization of an ethnic group or discrimination against it based on ethnicity will receive strong resistance ( strife). This is particularly seen in the mobilizing role of ethnic identity.Psycho-cultural contradict theorists like Ross (1997) and Horowitz (1998) recall that departures which atomic number 18 fountd by i dentity ar usually dangerous, violent, noncompliant and passing protracted, and often really difficult to resolve. This is because identity which is at the centre of the divergence, is an soused sense of worth, which makes liveliness significant and includes the feeling that one is physically, socially, psychologically and spiritually safe (Faleti, 2006, p. 51). When this feeling of safety (identity) is threatened, there is a defensive reception aiming at protecting this at all costs and the result is violent conflict which be conform tos a matter of life and death. This tends to affect uprisement since power is perpetually continued affecting productive sectors of topical anaesthetic economies.The psycho-cultural theory of conflict argues, therefore, that resolving this type of conflict is usually very difficult and tends to go any resolution mechanism. There is always constant outbreak of military group with such(prenominal) conflicts despite attempts at resolving the conflict. Their resolution takes long and more or lesstimes, it is non possible to talk of resolution, but management. This is because the issue of ethnic identity is hardy and its denial is a complete affront to the groups very creation. The outbreak of logical violence as a result of this type of conflict makes life and security fragile, thereby affecting human well-being and development. Thus, the link surrounded by ethnic conflicts, their resolution and development is clearly seen. Due to the deep-seated, protracted and intractable nature of conflicts based on identity (ethnic conflict), their resolution persist ins very difficult and takes very long, and this produces strings of violence thereby affecting meaningful development. Seymour (2003) therefore emphasized that identity influences the process of conflict and must non be all overlooked when attempting to understand the origins of conflict and when planning its resolution.The psycho-cultural conflict theory has been heavily criticized by many scholars. The theory has been criticized for attributing the main basis of conflict and violence to identity based on ethnicity. Critics be quick to guide out that there is a tendency for many people to grade any conflict as ethnic identity based when that conflict exceedingly has a different cause (Tonah, 2007).Bowen (1996) contends that those conflicts which are said to be based on ethnic identity are products of modern politics. He argues that although people have had many identities for long, which are based on their civilisation (ethnicity), these people only began to see themselves as members of vast groups, opposed to each other only during the modern period of colonization. Bowen (1996) mentioned that the Rwandan, Burundian and Bosnian conflicts are politically based conflicts rather than ethnic identity conflicts, but these conflicts later on assumed ethnic identity dimensions. Osaghae (2005) as well as argues that what is seen as ethni c conflict is not so, but elite manipulation of people to gain prefer of their political and personal ambitions. Ethnic identity, to him, is elitist manipulation of ethnicity to gain control over political power and what is seen as conflicts emanating from ethnic identity are not at all, but politically based conflicts. It is possible for elites to manipulate a group of people against each other. It is even possible for conflicts in some parts of Africa and other places to take ethnic dimensions even if the initial cause of the conflict is political, resource, religious or any other cause (Tonah, 2007).Ernest Penan (cited in Bowen, 1996) believes that ethnic identity is constructed by intellectuals for their personal interests and that ethnic identity is a set of ideas rather than peoples values in conflict. Chandra (2006) believes that ethnic identity does not matter or has not been shown to matter in explaining most outcomes of violence. Fearon Laitin (2000) also argue after an enquiry into the relationship between ethnic identity and violence that the mere observation that ethnic identities are socially constructed is not so.In conclusion, the Psycho-cultural Theory simply argues that identity based on ethnicity explains the main reason for conflicts in society. The weakness of the theory makes it imperative for this study to be able to properly identify the sources of ethnic conflict in the Bawku traditionalistic Area in order to devise appropriate resolution mechanisms to them. abstract frameworkIt remains evident that development is meaningfully achieved through the existence of relaxation. Peace here refers to the absence of violent conflict and effective conflict resolution which both border on security. Ethnic conflicts, very often, are intractable conflicts which involve values, claim to status, identity, deprivation of needs and external factors such as political infiltrations (Coleman, 2000). Thus, ethnic conflicts are often protracted and rema in very difficult to resolve and their continuous existence poses danger to local level development and they tend to seriously hinder security which is mandatory to ensure peace for development.Ethnic conflicts as shown in Figure 1 primarily result from past historical and colonial experiences which are unless exacerbated by factors like lack of access to power, resources and ethnic marginalization/stereotypes which are magnified by peoples struggle for their ethnic identity. The continuous ethnic polarisation through these factors leads to violence (conflict) which results in low investments in local sparing activities/commerce, lessen agricultural, educational and health standards, insecurity, high dependency ratio, loss of lives and low incomes for individuals and families. The end result of all these, as seen in Figure 1, is decreasing levels of socio-economic development.The effective resolution of ethnic conflicts can have positive implications for development. Schoeman (19 98) argues that a society in which people are secure (when violent conflict is properly resolved or is absent), willEnable people to develop their communitiesEnable people to be architects of their own livesEnable people to come together to pursue economic and other development andEnable people to participate in the development of the society.In resolving ethnic conflicts , one needs to focus on satisfying the basic needs which have been deprived (UN DESA, 2001) and also creating a proportional equality in implanted cultural and identity issues (Richardson Jr. Wang, 1993) victimisation third party discourse and inter-group cooperation (Horowitz, 2000 Lipchitz Crawford, 1995). All of these can be done by effectively zesty the conflicting parties in mediation, inter-group dialogue and third party intervention using indigenous methods. Issues which are mostly root causes of conflict when tackled properly results in effective conflict resolution thereby trickling down to sustainab le peace which has implications for local development.EffectsCore Problem clinical depression Investment collectable to insecurityDestruction of Property and infrastructureGeneral Insecurity little Agricultural ProductionLow commerceRefusal to accept postingLow IncomeDecreasing Educational and Health StandardsRetarded DevelopmentEthnic ConflictHigh Dependency RatioLow IncomeLoss of LivesLow Income poornessStruggle for Ethnic IdentityLack of access code to Power. e.g. Chieftaincy and semipolitical ConnectionsPast Historical and Colonial ExperiencesEthnic MarginalizationCausesLack of Access to Natural Resources. e.g. LandDecreasing Levels of Social/Economic Development